Those who wish to do further research on this matter should follow the canons of criminal investigations and ask the tough questions, such as “Who had the means, the opportunity, and motive?” and “Qui bono? That is, who benefited?”
AE911TRUTH STICKS TO THE SCIENCE OF 9/11, LEAVING “WHO” AND “WHY” UP TO OTHER INVESTIGATORS
By AE911Truth Staff
Who could gain entry to plant explosives in highly secure buildings like the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7? That question must be answered in a new investigation.
In order to determine who planned, financed, and carried out the controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers—the North Tower (Building 1), the South Tower (Building 2) and the Salomon Brothers Building (Building 7)—a fully resourced, unimpeachable investigation with subpoena power is required. Just as in any criminal matter, the perpetrators should be charged, tried, and convicted in a court of law before valid judgment can be made about guilt.
We at AE911Truth are technical and building professionals. We do not speculate about who may have been responsible for destroying these buildings. We do, however, point to overwhelming evidence of a cover-up of the crime. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was tasked by Congress to uncover how the three skyscrapers "collapsed." The reports that NIST provided in order to prop up the impossible hypothesis of collapse by fire were fraudulent. This fraud is exposed in our original documentary, 9/11: Blueprint for Truth (now available in six languages!), and will be further exposed in mid-January when the powerful Final Edition of our latest milestone DVD, 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, is released.
The topic of the motives behind the demolitions raises non-technical questions that are outside of our expertise and the scope of our examination. While we know that the WTC catastrophe has been used as justification to launch wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and to curtail civil liberties, it is up to criminal investigators, not architects and engineers, to identify motive and arrest suspects.
Whoever destroyed the WTC skyscrapers must have had access to the advanced nano-thermite material that was discovered in the dust samples from Ground Zero.
The technical experts at AE911Truth have performed the important task of gathering and analyzing the scientific evidence that proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by explosives. Since the crime of explosive destruction has been confirmed, it is time for government officials to heed international calls for a real investigation. Until such an inquiry is carried out, the effort to determine the identities of the criminals is left to those willing to research and construct working theories.
Those who wish to do further research on this matter should follow the canons of criminal investigations and ask the tough questions, such as “Who had the means, the opportunity, and motive?” and “Qui bono? That is, who benefited?”
David Ray Griffin is a prolific researcher in this field, having written 10 books on the subject of 9/11. Among other key topics that he addresses are questions like who had access to the WTC towers through the extremely tight security.
Kevin Ryan, another dedicated researcher, asks and answers questions about who had access to the extremely high-tech manufacturing of nano-thermite composite incendiaries that were found throughout the WTC dust as well as about which tenants and companies were doing construction work on the specific floors of the Twin Towers that were ultimately hit by the planes.
The Journal of 9/11 Studies also hosts numerous important peer-reviewed works that shed light on the subject of culpability.
We recommend that all seekers of the truth first familiarize themselves with the evidence outlined in the works of AE911Truth—and avoid the temptation to jump to conclusions. Such conjecture always causes the loss of credibility in the minds of those whom one is seeking to educate. Stick to the science of the destruction of these towers, deflect questions that are non-scientific, and watch the discussion gain strength, credibility, and resolution. That’s how we do it here at AE911Truth, and that’s why over 1600 architects and engineers [2,783 as of early February 2017] have signed our petition for a real investigation.
