AE911Truth realizes what a powerful tool it has in social media.
"Thankfully, you came out with your campaign on Building 7. I've been saying, I don't know how anybody can see that and afterwards still believe what they tell us!"
Popular Mechanics' myth about the notorious gouge would remain debunked even if NIST had decided that the "dark band" represented a gouge.
"Now they can no longer claim ignorance of the evidence or turn a blind eye to the crime of the century, which is a cover-up of the fact that these buildings were brought down in controlled demolitions that day." — Andrew Steele
"We realized that if the people who govern this national association of architects didn't even know the official explanation for the total collapse of a 47-story skyscraper, then there was truly a lot of misinformation out there — and it had to be corrected. So, ever since the convention, one of our major goals with the booklet has been to educate readers about what the official hypothesis of fire-induced failure actually says, so we can accurately compare and contrast it with the controlled demolition hypothesis." — Ted Walter
For those in the 9/11 Truth Movement who need the specific points of support for their WTC debates, AE911Truth has come up with a powerful tool — the individualized chapters of Experts Speak Out — now available on YouTube.
We have scrutinized what has been presented in various publications as evidence that nuclear blasts occurred at the WTC, but found none of the arguments substantiated.