Aside from this video being a powerful tool for mobilizing existing advocates to support the Bobby McIlvaine Act, we believe it will be uniquely effective for communicating with audiences who are new to the subject.
Aside from this video being a powerful tool for mobilizing existing advocates to support the Bobby McIlvaine Act, we believe it will be uniquely effective for communicating with audiences who are new to the subject.
If you have friends who are part of the scientific community or the building trades industry, share our evidence with them and urge them to sign the petition at AE911Truth.org.
“The idea of a local failure being initiated by thermally expanding floor beams which then leads to the symmetrical, free-fall collapse of the entire structure is so improbable that it would require a staggering amount of evidence to even be considered plausible. But NIST has not provided that evidence.”David Llewelyn
“This was not a case of some subtle differences, subtle discrepancies, or differences of scientific opinion that needed further investigation,” Peter Ketcham remarks in Stand for the Truth. “This was glaring. Glaring, clear-cut.”
Supporters of the 16-year-long, worldwide effort to bring about a new 9/11 investigation will not be surprised to learn that the Norwegian media has gone silent on the issue now that the chairman of Scandinavia’s Branch of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers has weighed in with his skepticism of the official account.
Share Our Translated Plasco Report with Every Farsi Speaker You Know
“Given how disastrous the official account has been for America and the world in general, perhaps some newspapers or TV networks will have the courage to point out that the Bush-Cheney account of 9/11, like the Bush-Cheney argument for attacking Iraq, was a lie.”David Ray Griffin